Pricing
Priced per environment, not per incident
Charging by investigation would give you a reason not to investigate, which defeats the point. Production and staging are what you pay for.
Why per environment
Pricing shapes behaviour long before anyone reads the invoice, and most usage-based models for this kind of tool shape it badly.
The obvious model would be per investigation. It sounds fair — you pay for what you use — and it is exactly wrong, because it puts a price on the moment someone is deciding whether a number looks odd enough to look into. At the margin, a per-investigation price does not produce revenue. It produces a shrug and a guess.
That matters more here than in most categories, because the failures this product is built for are the quiet ones. Nobody hesitates to investigate a pipeline that crashed. The 38% shortfall on a run that reported success is caught by somebody who thought a figure looked slightly off and decided to check — precisely the decision a per-use price discourages.
Per seat has the same defect in a different place. An investigation gets better when the people who know the pipeline can challenge a conclusion, attach the export nobody else has, or run the read-only check Decim wrote for them. Charging per head shrinks that group deliberately.
So the unit is the environment: a thing that exists whether or not anything went wrong this month, and whose value does not change with how carefully you use it.
Design partner
Free
during the pilot
For teams willing to give us real incidents and honest feedback while we build. Limited places.
- The whole current product, nothing held back
- A pilot scoped to the pipelines you choose
- GitHub, Google Cloud Logging and Jira Cloud
- Optional Windows agent for on-prem files and Event Logs
- Direct line to the people building it
Team
Contact us
per environment
For a data team running production pipelines that matter.
- Unlimited pipelines and investigations
- Every current integration
- Draft fix pull requests and PDF reports
- SSO and an exportable audit log
- Business-hours support
Enterprise
Contact us
For organisations with several environments, or a security review to satisfy first.
- Everything in Team
- Several environments on one agreement
- Security questionnaire and review support
- A say in roles, redaction and region choice as they are built
- Named support
Full comparison
Everything that makes an investigation trustworthy is in every plan, including the free one: pipeline discovery, cited log lines, competing hypotheses with the evidence for and against, checks for your team to run, draft fixes and the report. Those are not premium features; they are the product. What varies is scale and support. Rows marked planned are not available on any plan yet.
| Design partner | Team | Enterprise | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigations, with cited evidence | Included | Included | Included |
| Pipeline discovery from GitHub repositories | Included | Included | Included |
| GitHub App (code, commits, pull requests) | Included | Included | Included |
| Google Cloud Logging | Included | Included | Included |
| Jira Cloud ticket import | Included | Included | Included |
| File attachments (up to 500 MB each) | Included | Included | Included |
| Windows agent (optional) | Included | Included | Included |
| Read-only checks written for your team to run | Included | Included | Included |
| Draft fix pull requests | Included | Included | Included |
| PDF board report and JSON export | Included | Included | Included |
| SSO (Microsoft Entra ID, Google, GitHub) | Included | Included | Included |
| Audit log with CSV and JSON export | Included | Included | Included |
| Pipelines | Pilot scope | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Environments | 1 | Priced per environment | Priced per environment |
| Alert intake (Datadog, PagerDuty, CloudWatch, webhook) | Preview | Preview | Preview |
| Database, scheduler and cloud ETL connectors | Planned | Planned | Planned |
| Roles and fine-grained access | Planned | Planned | Planned |
| Redaction | Planned | Planned | Planned |
| Configurable retention | Planned | Planned | Planned |
| Region choice | — | — | Roadmap discussion |
| Self-hosted deployment | — | — | Roadmap discussion |
| Support | Direct, informal | Business hours | Named contact |
What counts as an environment
The billing unit, defined precisely — because a vague unit is how a bill becomes a surprise.
An environment is a set of systems you would investigate as one thing. Usually that maps to production, staging, and sometimes a disaster-recovery estate. The test is practical rather than architectural: if an incident in one place would never send you looking at the other, they are separate environments.
What an environment explicitly does not depend on:
- How many databases, services or repositories it contains
- How many pipelines run in it
- How many log sources you connect, or agents you install
- How many people look at the results
- How many incidents happen in it
A single production environment with forty services in Python, .NET and Java, a set of scheduled SQL jobs, a few cloud ETL jobs and a warehouse is one environment. That is deliberate: a model that charged per component would penalise exactly the teams with the most to investigate.
What is deliberately not metered
Four things we could charge for and do not, because charging would make the product worse.
Each of these is a case where a meter would change behaviour in a direction that damages the thing you are paying for.
| What | Why not |
|---|---|
| Investigations | A per-investigation price teaches teams to guess instead of investigate, which is precisely the behaviour this product exists to replace. |
| Seats | Challenging a conclusion, adding a file or running a check Decim wrote is how an investigation gets sharper. Charging per head means fewer people do it. |
| Evidence storage | Retention is fixed today and published on the security page. When it becomes configurable it will be a security decision, not a line item, so nobody picks a shorter window to save money. |
| Re-investigation | A conclusion that does not survive new evidence was never a conclusion. New evidence opens a new hypothesis revision, and that has to be free or nobody will add it. |
Common questions
Why no prices on this page?
Is GitHub included in the free pilot?
Is staging a separate environment?
What if one environment has dozens of services and databases?
Do we need the Windows agent, and does it count towards anything?
What happens if we stop?
Can we trial it on a real incident before committing?
Related: design partners for what a pilot involves; security for what Decim reads, where evidence goes and how long it is kept; and the product for what is actually included.
Get started
Not sure which applies?
Tell us what you run and how it breaks. We will tell you honestly whether this helps yet — including if the answer is not yet.